Re: UNAPPROVED dpkg nmu

To: Debian Devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
From: Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:47:56 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 404F62DC.4070309@beamnet.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0403101225170.13832@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402272039560.2158-100000@gradall.private.brainfood.com> <[🔎] E1B0lfQ-0006oB-5y@mid.downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0403101225170.13832@gradall.private.brainfood.com>

Hey, I'm glad you sorted that out. If only all flame wa^W^W
controversial discussions yielded that good results, I'd be all for
having more of them rather than fewer. :)

Cheers

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, <http://beamnet.de/tv/>

Attachment: pgpJ4lR1r06VD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
Next by Date: Re: [custom] Custom Debian Distros need the help from debian developers
Previous by thread: Re: re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
Next by thread: Re: [custom] Custom Debian Distros need the help from debian developers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu

Re: UNAPPROVED dpkg nmu