Re: OpenAFS in UML
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 01:32:39PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The problem is more that there isn't a particularly good alternative that
> doesn't involve patching the kernel. If you have an alternative that
> doesn't involve patching the kernel, or alternately have a patch that will
> be accepted into the kernel, please speak up!
The only alternative is real PAG support which needs significant
changes to the kernel. And it won't happen for an out of tree
filesystem with an GPL-incompatible license like OpenAFS. It will
probably happen rather soon for kAFS and NFSv4.
Reply to: