Re: [custom] Custom Debian Distros need the help from debian developers
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [custom] Custom Debian Distros need the help from debian developers
- From: Free Ekanayaka <free@agnula.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:45:12 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87llmh1omv.fsf@agnula.org>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0402291506260.6043@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de> (Andreas Tille's message of "Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:09:48 +0100 (CET)")
- References: <E1AsIC1-0006vG-00@minerva.hungry.com> <20040229090412.GA32374@yukidoke.org> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0402291506260.6043@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de>
>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> writes:
Andreas> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
>> Basically, I sympathizes with Petter in his frustration and
>> agree with Enrico in his evaluation of the problem and proposed
>> plan of action: the CDD folks among us need to finish writing
>> up some good
Andreas> Please watch
Andreas> http://people.debian.org/~tille/debian-med/paper-cdd
Andreas> closely for daily updates and wish me spare time to
Andreas> finish this work. I's be happy about orthographic
Andreas> corretcions and corrections and enhancements in terms of
Andreas> contents ...
Andreas, I've read again your paper and I've just noticed that your
are referencing #186085 (maybe the first time I was too tired, or it's
newly added).
Quoting Joe Hess:
> I have been holding off on doing anything on this bug because I am
> not sure how tasksel should relate to debian sub distributions. We
> added debian jr a while back, but it has a wider possible user base
> than many sub distributions, and it makes sense you may want it on a
> machine that is also used for other tasks. It was also the first sub
> distro, and so a special case at the time, not something I can
> generalize into a general policy for tasksel.
[...]
> There is also the concern that what's in tasksel's tasks can impact
> what goes onto the first CD, although it doesn't have to, and I
> don't always keep this at the top of my mind when adding new stuff
> to tasksel tasks. Debian-Med encompasses 90+ mb of debs, so I have
> to consider this.
Is it critical for Debian that all the packages belonging to a task
fit on this first CD? After all having to change a CD-ROM during the
installation should not that big deal for a user, but I may be missing
something..
Considering now that DVD readers and burners are becoming cheaper and
more popular, this issue might be partly solved in the near future. On
http://www.debian-cd.com/ they already produce woody/sarge DVDs.
> Might it not be better if for subdistributions we generated customized
> install cds for those distribututions? These could have everything
> needed for that specific purpose on the one cd, and would automatically
> install it. These CDs could be blessed by the debian project and created
> with the debian-cd package like our regular cds.
Would a general, CDD independent, framework for automatically creating
such ISO/DVD images make sense? For example there might be scripts on
a server which take care of creating and updating such images
according to the dependences of the task packages of a given CDD, or
to some sort of rules defined inside in one of its task packages
(e.g. debian-med-cd).
Free
Reply to: