Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.

To: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:40:06 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040302184006.GA29145@scowler.net>
Mail-followup-to: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>, Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040302171425.GA23687@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
References: <[🔎] 20040302051853.79948.qmail@web11904.mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 20040302061234.GA24641@hezmatt.org> <[🔎] 200403021347.36583.tim@eisbox.eis> <[🔎] 20040302160552.GB6601@puntila.winnegan.fake> <[🔎] 20040302171425.GA23687@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>

> Is dash guaranteed to be POSIX 1003.* conforming?

No, but posh is supposed to be, and any discrepancies should be filed as
bug reports.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- posh: doesn't barf as it should on peculiar here-document-within-command-subst construction
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

References:
- bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: Mike Mestnik <cheako911@yahoo.com>
- Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: Martin Albert <MartinAlbert@gmx.net>
- Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: bsb@winnegan.de (Bernd S. Brentrup)
- Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>

Prev by Date: Re: POSIX shell specification insight requested
Next by Date: Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
Previous by thread: Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
Next by thread: posh: doesn't barf as it should on peculiar here-document-within-command-subst construction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread