Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
From: Robert Lemmen <robertle@semistable.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:35:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040302173506.GD16438@sandbender>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040302160552.GB6601@puntila.winnegan.fake>
References: <[🔎] 20040302051853.79948.qmail@web11904.mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 20040302061234.GA24641@hezmatt.org> <[🔎] 200403021347.36583.tim@eisbox.eis> <[🔎] 20040302160552.GB6601@puntila.winnegan.fake>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Bernd S. Brentrup wrote:
> Why not test maintainer scripts in a chroot with /bin/sh -> dash?

might be hard to cover all code paths...

cu  robert

-- 
Robert Lemmen                               http://www.semistable.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: Mike Mestnik <cheako911@yahoo.com>
- Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: Martin Albert <MartinAlbert@gmx.net>
- Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
  - From: bsb@winnegan.de (Bernd S. Brentrup)

Prev by Date: [Debconf 4] Group discounts
Next by Date: POSIX shell specification insight requested
Previous by thread: Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
Next by thread: Re: bashisems in maintainer scripts.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread