Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
From: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:11:48 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 200402131911.48097.will@misconception.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040213045455.GF12165@azure.humbug.org.au>
References: <[🔎] 200402102245.39304.neroden@twcny.rr.com> <[🔎] 200402121941.25655.will@misconception.org.uk> <[🔎] 20040213045455.GF12165@azure.humbug.org.au>

On Friday 13 Feb 2004 4:54 am, Anthony Towns wrote:

> That's funny, I thought I just documented the right thing. You don't
> think that people might be ignoring the suggestions of what the right
> thing is, do you?

I'd really like a Communicating-With-Troup-HOWTO.

debian-doc or developers-reference?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
  - From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
  - From: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>
- Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
Next by Date: Re: Why Linux, Why Debian
Previous by thread: Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
Next by thread: Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread