Re: Packages still using old-style debconf

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages still using old-style debconf
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:38:35 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 84d68p5h90.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040207090833.GP31190@mykerinos> (Christian Perrier's message of "Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:08:33 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 20040207090833.GP31190@mykerinos>

>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> writes:

    Christian> Please, if one of your package is listed there, prove
    Christian> me wrong...:-)

What is the best reference to lean about the advantages of the new
system and how to switch over to it?
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages still using old-style debconf
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: Packages still using old-style debconf
  - From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>

References:
- Packages still using old-style debconf
  - From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#231793: ITP: libatomic_ops -- The atomic_ops library
Next by Date: Re: Packages still using old-style debconf
Previous by thread: Re: Packages still using old-style debconf
Next by thread: Re: Packages still using old-style debconf
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread