Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Another important problem is that orphaning a package isn't really a > panacea either. You'd be surprised how many packages which were > orphaned because the maintainer is inactive are still orphaned 3 > months later (and are then often removed). We also have to think of > better defining and controlling what should enter the archive. Maybe requirering co-maintainers would be an idea (or a second from a current developer for ITPs). Sponsorship does some of that, but isn't a perfect solution. Kind regards Thomas
Attachment:
pgpgpRoWqg35q.pgp
Description: PGP signature