Re: murphy is listed on spamcop
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 03:24:24PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 December 2004 11:14, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> > I've had enough problems with utterly bogus spamcap blocking that your
> > statement ("the system seems to be working well") seems completely
> > ludicrous on the face of it. False positives are indeed a (big) problem
> > with spamcop.
>
> Any anti-spam measure that gets any large portion of the spam will have some
> false positives.
Too bad master/gluck don't get listed they forward several GB of viruses
to me per month, but then thats viruses not spam. :\
Chris
Reply to: