Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
5.12.2004 pisze William Ballard (email@example.com):
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:28:14PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > might want, and put it on non-us since it is illegal to distribute such
> > things in the USA (and unlike the possibility of offending people's
> > sensibilities, THIS is a real issue as things stand). While at it, we
> They have had quite a few major busts of child pornographers in Europe
> and also Asia. Europe doesn't tolerate *everything*.
But it tolerates poorly-drawn cartoons without pornographic content.
[Which is the case of the original hot-babe pictures - they are so
poorly drawn, that they're hardly erotic.]
It looks like some discutants here cannot just tolerate such atrocities
and found necessary to compel Debian to ban such a disgusting machismo.
Or such a disgusting child-spoiling nudity. I'd like to dedicate
<http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2004112605020534> to them.
The interesting part is, how easily some of us resort to the plain, old
censorship in the name of greater good. And how independent it is from
being conservative or liberal [in the original meaning of these words].
[ Miros/law L Baran, baran-at-knm-org-pl, neg IQ, cert AI ] [ 0101010 is ]
[ BOF2510053411, makabra.knm.org.pl/~baran/, alchemy pany ] [ The Answer ]
Weiner's Law of Libraries:
There are no answers, only cross references.