On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:38:30PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 13:16 -0500, Nick Sillik wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 16:22 +0100, Paul Plop wrote: > > > A flower may not be a good idea. For many specialists, a flower is a > > > phallic representation. I could hurt some people's sensibility. > > I was thinking that we could use pictures of the Eiffel Tower or > > Washington Monument in various stages of construction. > "skinnable" images is the best idea in this situation. That way, > whatever pictures you want, you can have. Isn't the skin the problem? -- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, Paul.Hampson@Anu.edu.au 7th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.
Description: Digital signature