Re: Bug#284283: ITP: fairuse -- spam filter based on sender identity verification

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Stephen Birch (sgbirch@imsmail.org) [041205 09:10]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> * Package name    : fairuse
>   Version         : x.y.z
>   Upstream Author : Name <somebody@example.org>
> * URL             : http://www.example.org/
If you don't mind to update this information, it might be good :)

> * License         : Free for non-commercial use
means non-free, right?
>   Description     : spam filter based on sender identity verification
> 
> Subject to license verification (DFSG compliant):
> 
> FairUCE is a spam filter that prevents spam from reaching the
> recipient's inbox by verifying the identity of the sender. It will stop
> the vast majority of spam without the use of a content filter, and
> without requiring a probable spam or bulk folder that needs to be
> checked periodically.

Is the name FairUCE or fairuse? And, what is the major advantage over
e.g. using SPF? (In other words: In which way is the verification done?)


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C