Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:20:32 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:11:56PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:17:05 +1100, Brian May <email@example.com>
>> > My point was for somebody thinking along the lines: "I want to
>> > distribute Debian to this target audience but I don't want to
>> > risk upsetting anybody or risk getting arrested and I don't want
>> > to have to do it in secret". -- Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Well, remember to exclude the Linux kernel, then. It is certainly
>> not minor friendly.
> Consider intent. The linux kernel source code intends to be (a)
> compilable and also useful as
Hot babe is also intrended to be useful, and display CPU
load. The intent is systems monitoring.
> (b) educational. As a side-effect, it contains swearing.
As a side effect, hot-babe contains Bruno Bellamy art.
> hot-babe exists only to display images, presently of naked women.
> Hence the name.
You have no clue what you are discussion. The primnary intent
is CPU monitoring, the side effect is to display Bruno Bellamy artwork.
You had mail. Paul read it, so ask him what it said.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C