[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
> but I think that hotbabe demonstrates a larger issue.

The only issue I can see is that WNPP does not seem to by a fully
sufficient synchronization point for the creation of new Debian
packages. This ITP has been filed although two RFPs already exist
(as hotbabe and hot-babe), which have neither been retitled nor

Reply to: