[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 04:43, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org> writes:
> > No, that doesn't work. There's some base level of stuff that's so
> > unlawful we don't include it because it would cut off far too much of
> > the userbase (or cause them to commit illegal acts).
> So if you think the package in question is actually illegal, you hire
> the lawyer and then come back and let us know.

We don't take that attitude to software licenses. Why should we take it to 
other laws? If someone can provide evidence (which I don't think would be 
very hard to get) that this is illegal in various countries, why is that 
different from someone saying something is non-distributable in the US 
because of patent issues?

Reply to: