[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:02:48 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> said: 

> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:36:50PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:06:13PM +0000, Helen Faulkner <helen_ml_faulkner@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> > I think that is the main issue here.  I would like to believe
>> > that Debian is capable of showing more respect for other people
>> > than including hotbabe in the distribution would indicate.
>> Yeah, i would like Debian to show more respect for me, by removing
>> emacs and kde.
>> Ah, the guy next door says he wants respect as well, and asks
>> removal of vim and gnome.
>> I'm pushing the thing to the absurd, but do you realise what you
>> are saying is absolutely ridiculous ?

> Really, you can't see any difference between kde and hot-babe?

> Does NM include a half-a-clue check?

	Sure. Let us include an inquisition phase in NM that tests
 candidate DD's for moral pulchritude as well, and make sure they all
 practice RightThink.

I have never been one to sacrifice my appetite on the altar of
appearance. A.M. Readyhough
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: