[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor



On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 21:23 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:51:55PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> > I'm not sure, how »pornography« is defined in the US and I really didn't
> > intend to join your nice discussion, but could you please keep in mind,
> > that it just show rough pixely pictures of a drawn woman?
> 
> The problem with pornography in the US is that it isn't defined. It's
> officially "I'll know it when I see it." Tread carefully.

Add to that, "contributing to the delinquency of a minor" if the
disk gets in the hand of a juvenile (the younger the "better") and
the prosecutor is up for re-election or has further political 
political ambitions.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

Why won't GWB have the US invade the DPRK? Because the People's
Army has 11-15,000 cannons all aimed at Seoul...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: