On Nov 10, Jamie Thompson <debian-bugs@jamie-thompson.co.uk> wrote: > The current version of the netbase package corrected bug #275244 by > adding the entry "ypxfrd 600100069" to /etc/rpc. > > I however already had an entry for ypxfrd in my /etc/rpc, "ypxfrd 100069". The addtion of this alternate name violates the unique name policy I thought the lookup tables used. I noticed this when I was updating my LDAP with the alterations and found that I could only have one port number for each service name, leading me to reason this is invalid. I noticed this, but I have no clue about which one is correct. I'm waiting for more information. -- ciao, | Marco | [9114 re8uEw2n5qyC6]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature