[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#280546: netbase: multiple definitions for ypxfrd in /etc/rpc

On Nov 10, Jamie Thompson <debian-bugs@jamie-thompson.co.uk> wrote:

> The current version of the netbase package corrected bug #275244 by
> adding the entry "ypxfrd          600100069" to /etc/rpc.
> I however already had an entry for ypxfrd in my /etc/rpc, "ypxfrd          100069". The addtion of this alternate name violates the unique name policy I thought the lookup tables used. I noticed this when I was updating my LDAP with the alterations and found that I could only have one port number for each service name, leading me to reason this is invalid.

I noticed this, but I have no clue about which one is correct.
I'm waiting for more information.

ciao, |
Marco | [9114 re8uEw2n5qyC6]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: