[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: $HOME/.dotfiles and FHS 2.3 (was: Comparing FHS 2.3 and 2.1)



On Nov 07, Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:

> It would have been a good idea when these programs were being written.
> It doesn't seem at all worthwhile to endure a transition of existing
> software for the marginal aesthetic benefits.
Agreed. I see no point in even discussing this, considering that FHS
says "should" and not "must".

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [9020 baWEaEGQpMwlw]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: