Re: proposal: 'xterm' alternatives entry
Peter Eisentraut <email@example.com> wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote:
>> What do you think of this proposal. Are there any string points
>> *against* it?
> I have written scripts that explicitly call xterm because other terminal
> emulator programs under X (which I had preferred otherwise) couldn't
> handle certain programs. So in those situations it was not a generic
> name, but a specific program with specific capabilities.
Does the package description mention the feature which is needed?
Thomas E. Dickey