[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: about volatile.d.o/n



On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Packages like virus checkers seem to be
> > composed of 2 parts: the app program and the data where the data in
> > this case are virus sigs and the app is say clamav. And the 'volitile'
> > part is the virus sigs whereas the app (once it hits stable) shouldnt
> > change unless it warrents a 'security' update. So, volitile should be
> > for the data/virus sigs that need updating when new bugs hit the 'net.
> > 
> 
> No, often such kind of programs need engine update. That's true for
> both AV and antispam programs as well.
> 
> -- 
> Francesco P. Lovergine
Hi Francesco,
so:
the program = engine part + (some un-named part) ???
and the engine part and the data part are volitile

-Kev

-- 

        (__)
        (oo)
  /------\/
 / |    ||
*  /\---/\
   ~~   ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: