Re: about volatile.d.o/n

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 21:26:11 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20041008192611.GC6468@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041008191014.GD4045@gandalf.libero.it>
References: <[🔎] 20041008155148.GT8964@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20041008191014.GD4045@gandalf.libero.it>

Hi,

* Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie@debian.org) [041008 21:15]:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 05:51:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:

> > - for bugs, the normal debian bug tracking system should be used.

> ... adding a volatile tag probably as for experimental? But if nothing
> would be broken by volatile pkgs, probably BTS is superfluous ;-)

After sarge, the BTS is able to track versions.



Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- about volatile.d.o/n
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: about volatile.d.o/n
  - From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
Next by Date: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
Previous by thread: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
Next by thread: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread