Re: about volatile.d.o/n

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 21:01:06 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20041008190105.GB6468@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041008184724.GA22211@cirrus.madduck.net>
References: <[🔎] 20041008155148.GT8964@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20041008181924.GA29963@jas.helas.net> <[🔎] 20041008182427.GA19082@cirrus.madduck.net> <[🔎] 20041008182937.GA12068@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 20041008184724.GA22211@cirrus.madduck.net>

* martin f krafft (madduck@debian.org) [041008 20:50]:
> also sprach Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> [2004.10.08.2029 +0200]:
> > Is looking up .org domains in the wrong whois server enough to be
> > considered "useless"?

> I found it rather useless in woody when the .org registrar changed.

There are more packages that I consider rather useless than that should
be included in volatile - the criterion should be what almost everybody
considers useless.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- about volatile.d.o/n
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: about volatile.d.o/n
  - From: Martin Zobel-Helas <mhelas@helas.net>
- Re: about volatile.d.o/n
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: about volatile.d.o/n
  - From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: about volatile.d.o/n
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
Next by Date: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
Previous by thread: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
Next by thread: Re: about volatile.d.o/n
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread