Re: Bug#274923: ITP: wnpp -- C++ library for robust numerical and geometric computation

[Joachim Reichel <joachim.reichel@gmx.de>]

Hi,

> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name    : core
>
> This seems a tad generic, especially since it's a library.  Maybe
> libcoremath or libcore++?

Hmm, you're right. Does your comment only apply to the source package name 
or also to the binary package names? I intend to make the following packages:

Source: libcore
Binary: libcore1, libcore-dev, libcore-doc, libcore-demo

If the names above are still too generic, I think I will use libcore++ as 
prefix. Or has anyone else another suggestion?

I'm a bit uncertain about potential consequences if the Debian package name 
differs too much from the upstream package name.

Regards,
  Joachim