Re: Updating scanners and filters in Debian stable (3.1)
> >
> > clamav can be as stable as a rock but be completely useless... when
> > two months after Sarge's release, a new virus hits hard, and in
> > order to detect it, clamav needs libfoo, which is not in Debian.
> > What then? *Maybe* we could push a new clamav via security.d.o, but
> > what about libfoo?
>
You could take the rather horrible step of building a static copy of libfoo
into clamav. This would be rather messy, but would allow a single binary to
be updated.
--
John Lines <http://www.paladin.demon.co.uk/john.lines.html>
Reply to: