Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@debian.org> writes:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org> writes:
>> OK, in that case i'd like to adopt libwww-perl.
> Sure, with the proviso that, since that is one package I have
> generally made a point of keeping up to date,
"Keeping up to date" != Maintaining.
Your way of dealing with bugs is the best example for the difference
between well maintained packages and packages just kept up to
date. Though you fixed some bugs in the last months, everything you
could not solve directly seems to be just lying around.
#140974 was filed 2 and a half years ago and still waits for the first
maintainer reaction. At least you could have forwarded it to upstream!
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
Attachment:
pgpI7khg9vT37.pgp
Description: PGP signature