Use of automake & friends vs. just running configure
Sorry if this has been dealt with before (and being such common,
probably it has been). Well, to the topic: there is a lot of software
our there built to use the automake and friends tools. However, upstream
ususually provides a ready to run ./configure script. I've always used
it as the starting point for building the package in the debian/rules
file, but now I wonder why I'm not running all the automake etc.
toolchain before. I know that in most circumstances it would make no
difference, and in any case would add new Build-Depends. But maybe that
would help to maintain the packages in the long run, specially if I have
to tinker a bit with Makefiles and the like (as is the case with one
package I'm building these days), and probably cannot harm.
So, any comment / recommendation? Better to use the whole toolchain, or
better to use upstream configure, when available?
Contribute to keep Europe free of software patents!
EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona | Grupo de Sistemas y Comunicaciones
firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com | ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
tel: +34 91 664 74 67 | c/ Tulipan s/n
fax: +34 91 488 70 49 | 28933 Mostoles, Spain