[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Buildds slow/unuseable -> drop that arch



On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:10:00PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Eduard Bloch:
> 
> > Efforts to keep dead architecturs alive are noble, but not very
> > rational from the practical point of view.
> 
> In some cases, fringe architectures have helped Debian to improve as a
> whole (for example, when they switched to a new GCC version before the
> main distribution and provided hints of what has to be changed).

So it's a good idea for us to continue to support fringe architectures
in unstable. Is it necessary for them to be released, and influence
'testing'?

Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>



Reply to: