Re: Bug#241689: I'm going to NMU this
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:27:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Brian Nelson <email@example.com> writes:
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:09:09PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Scott James Remnant <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >> > (b) that you were a Debian Developer therefore *could* NMU a package.
> >> I don't need to be a DD to NMU something.
> > Um, yeah you do. No developer should be signing off on an NMU for a
> > non-DD, ever, especially for a non-DD who was rejected from the NM
> > queue. Any developer that does that needs to be banned, or at least
> > beaten severely.
> Ok, let me rephrase this:
> I don't need to be a DD to prepare a patch and get a DD to NMU it.
Yes, that's fine.
> PS: I suppose you also want to bann everyone that uploaded a binary
> porting NMU for me and remove all those uploads (which might be a 4
> digit number by now) and remove my packages too?
Pretty much. It's nothing personal against you. It's the principle of
it. Binaries should only come from developers--everything else is
"untrusted". It doesn't make sense to trust your binaries enough to
distribute them if we don't trust you enough to make you a developer.
 I was never fully convinced you should have been rejected. I find
you to be a giant pain in the ass at times, but the same can be said
for dozens of developers.
Blast you and your estrogenical treachery!