Re: Bug#241689: I'm going to NMU this
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 04:39:12PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Andres Salomon wrote:
> >Ultimately, it's a trust issue; you might find it dangerous for a DD to
> >trust the non-DD, but that's the path that Debian has chosen by making
> >sponsorship a requirement for NM, and the NM process itself so drawn out.
> Drawn out so much as to have come to a complete halt during this rather
> pivotal period in Sarge development .
>  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/08/msg01349.html
Complete halt? That mail was posted a week ago. There actually was
quite a bit of NM approvals earlier this month.
(Prior to that, there was no activity for about 6 months. Shouldn't you
have complained then?)
> Do we not have a backup DAM at all?
Not a functioning one, no.
Blast you and your estrogenical treachery!