On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:12:35AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx> writes: > > > Perhaps if you were to fix bugs over 2 years old a bit sooner people > > wouldn't NMU your packages... > > You mean miscfiles is the only package with bugs two years old? > Wonderful! But, I think actually not. No, but you seem to be the only one complaining about people fixing 2 year old bugs. > > http://www.puc.state.tx.us/telecomm/areacodes/houston.cfm > > Alas, individual state PUC's are unreliable. Sometimes they advertise > as "done deals" things which are proposed and not final--and with area > codes being what they are, anything not final sometimes never > happens. And they do that, alas, because they have a political stake > sometimes in a thing being perceived as a done deal, when it's not. > > The best source is www.nanpa.com: the horse's mouth, as it were. In this case the puc site has much more accurate and detailed information including both NPA/NXX for each city. The nanpa.com site doesn't even give accurate information for the NPA in Sugar Land. > > Sugar Land is not in 713, but it was not listed in miscfiles at all > > prior to this NMU so its not that big of an issue. > > Um, yes it was. Oops, I misread the diff, the correction done in #249867 was just to fix the fact that whoever added it did not know what state "TX" was. It didn't add any area codes at all and in fact didn't address the issue that Sugar Land is not in the 713 area code. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature