[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: amd64 and sarge

* Xavier Roche (roche@httrack.com) [040726 22:10]:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > 5. our users will profit if we can give them at least some support for
> > amd64 (means: more than only i386).
> 6. migrate to a 32/64 port immediately after r0 and schedule r1 few month
> later
> or
> 6a. fix all pending bugs on amd64/r0, set it as "official port" and
> release r1 few months later
> 6b. migrate to 32/64 dist, and release r2 few months later

6a is what I said (except that my idea was to create the directories
now, to preserve the right version of the packages), and 6, 6b is not
doable. Either we take amd64 as is in sarge, or we don't take it at

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: