retitle 261093 RFP: libspf -- sender policy framework (SPF) library retitle 261189 RFP: libsrs -- sender rewriting scheme (SRS) library thanks also sprach Colin Watson <email@example.com> [2004.07.24.1321 +0200]: > I have to say, that page entirely convinces me that its author is > a kook, and that I should stay well away from any code written by > the person railing against Shevek. well, i am in conversation with him and not entirely convinced that i do actually want to package libspf/libsrs. while i think that the library should definitely be in debian just to give out users a choice, i am afraid that maintaining it will expose me to more of the politics than i am willing to handle. also, i don't use either of the libraries myself, so i cannot make a technical statement. if libspf2 is really more advanced, then by all means, libspf's use should not be fostered, even though that's a harsh call for its author. but i feel that only someone who's tried them both can make a statement here. until that statement is made, i will leave the two ITPs as RFPs. if i choose to package them in the end, i will definitely drop "official" from the descriptions. if someone else packages them, i urge her/him to do the same. cheers, -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature