On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 18:28 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Colin Watson (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040720 17:55]: > > I think it is extremely unwise to set a precedent of overriding > > technical decisions for essentially political reasons, and I do not > > think that the release management team should view this pending vote as > > a blocking issue for sarge. > > > > I would like my objections to be registered on the ballot somehow, but I > > don't really have time to put together an amendment. Can anybody help > > here? > > For those interessted in that: I'm currently drafting an amendment, > see http://people.debian.org/~aba/proposal-amd64 for the current > status. > I don't think this represents Colin's wishes; it certainly doesn't represent mine. I'd rather an amendment that just stated: "The Debian Project resolves that the General Resolution process is not appropriate for this decision and leaves this up to the appropriate people." Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part