[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:29:39PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> >When you accused me of interpreting official documents "pedanticaly", I
> >wondered what you meant exactly with being pedantic.
> Please don't top-post, it makes the baby Jesus cry.
> More seriously - the constitution clearly defines what can and can't be
> done with GRs. The social contract's "We will not hide problems" makes
> no clear statement about how certain kinds of business should be carried
> out. The two situations are not desperately analagous.

A decision through inaction is still a decision... this proposal seems
to fit with 4.1 3 just fine to me.

> (Context for those not on #debian-devel - I suggested that a more
> appropriate mechanism for dealing with this problem would have been for
> private discussion to have taken place in a non-confrontational manner.
> Robert suggested that this would be breaching clause 3 of the social
> contract)

More private discussion with whom ourselves? ftpmaster refuses to
comment on any email sent them, the only way I managed to get Daniel to
respond was that he was already asking me questions on irc about an
unrelated matter, so I essentially trapped him into responding.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: