On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:57:33AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:42:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Let me mitigate that complaint by observing: > > 1) Maybe no one is sure whose bailiwick it is; > > We need people who are very good at legal stuff and are willing to take > it on - telling us about it won't do much good when we're all flat-out > busy with other stuff, with very little time to look at X. Well -- believe it or not -- there are things I enjoy more than being a license janitor, too. It's miserable but necessary work. It seems like there is no divergence of opinion here, just the lack of a bulldog to ensure it's regarded as release-critical (for X.Org/freedesktop.org). [Debrix not including equivlent driver functionality as XOrg] > > It does not, and it may be quite some time before it does. > > It will not; the 'independent' in DIX is a misnomer designed to convince > naive idiots new to X that you can put the Xorg DDX on top of the KDrive > DIX and have stuff just work. Fools. Thanks for the clarification. -- G. Branden Robinson | When we call others dogmatic, what Debian GNU/Linux | we really object to is their branden@debian.org | holding dogmas that are different http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | from our own. -- Charles Issawi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature