Re: Freeswan in Debian, or: Why I am such a bad maintainer

[Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>]

Rene Mayrhofer schrieb:
> So please tell me what you think. If there's no real compelling reason 
> to keep both, I'd really like to drop freeswan in favor of openswan.

I just had the case that freeswan would not work anymore. A disabled a 
tunnel some time ago, build a new kernel later and wanted to enable it 
last week. It is a roadwarrior setup, where on the server side pluto 
just segfaults when an ipsec connection is tried to be established. I 
used freeswan-modules-source_2.04-7. 2.04-9 was not buildable. The 
discussion about openswan come just in time. I tried openswan an it 
worked out of the box. So I will try to replace freeswan with all of my 
tunnels (~10) in the next time.

Thanks
	Christoph

--
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  Christoph.Martin@Uni-Mainz.DE
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature