On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:47:55PM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote: > I just got a fresh co of DRI DRM and Mesa on my Sparc64 /w 64bit kernel. > Mesa(linux-dri) built withougt a fuss, unlike b4 where it boomed on > register errors. However xc(World) bommed trying too > build(lib/GL/mesa/sparc/sparc.c) . There is no sign(*.o) that anything > from the sparc dir was built in Mesa. On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:02:10PM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote: > Haha, ok It lookes like brianp's fix is in. What's not working is the old > added to Mesa but not to xc's Makefile? > I'l see what else I can dig up, if I can just cp or ln these files. On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:22:05AM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote: > I added "-I . -I .." to the makefile and got another erromsg that ran off > the screen. I may be able to reproduce it with tee(a logger) sometime > later today. On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:33:50AM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote: > Dam these headers is there any WORKING Imakefile I should copy from? CVS > commits I should look at? On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 05:05:29PM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote: > I think I got everything built. I have stoped working on the dri xc tree > when I saw libGL and the like in the Mesa tree. Is the 2d driver the only > thing left in the ?old? dri xc tree? The only work I know of from there, > that is not allready in Xfree86, is the radeon mfb code. This sort of...monologue is probably better suited to the debian-x mailing list. http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/ I would be interested in applying patches to Debian's XFree86 packages to implement/improve DRI support on SPARC64 machines, as long as they are not too disruptive. -- G. Branden Robinson | I'm sorry if the following sounds Debian GNU/Linux | combative and excessively personal, branden@debian.org | but that's my general style. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Ian Jackson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature