Re: Analysis of the ballot options
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> The technical committee is waiting to see the outcome of this GR, but
> informally
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2004/06/msg00002.html
If the RM has delegated the descision of the requirements for distributing
sarge, could the TC take a stance on the proposals presented?
Well looking at that post some of the points were:
| ... It would be a bad idea to write a long document `under the gun'. ...
This pretty much pleads agains proposal E.
| ... Any such grandfather resolution should probably delegate reasonably
| wide discretion about scope and interpretation to the Release Manager,
| the Project Leader, the Committee or some other similar person or body,
| to ensure that the resolution is sufficient and we don't need another
| GR. ...
Well none of the proposals really seem to do this, except for maybe
proposals C and E. All the others fall back to the previous (ambiguous)
SC.
Would it be correct to assume that only the passing of proposal C will
allow for a speedy release of sarge if it were up to the TC?
- -- arthur - adejong@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA2MOmVYan35+NCKcRArucAKCVSmfDlGmSbIUodR70NU2ajkkdUgCgyu9b
XlmXyfD8bGJtE6X28lZNDzg=
=dSqs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: