Re: -rpath and policy?
Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:56:12AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> Anything that uses -rpath will break in sarge+1 when/if multiarch is
>> >> introduced.
>> > So why does policy not mention it?
>> People probably thought it was common sense and not worth adding to
>> policy? Maybe you should send a proposal to add it?
> More likely no one has actually done the work. Policy is supposed to
> document practice.
> - mdz
Lintian complains about use of rpath (not sure for how long) so any
recently build package should have gotten the warning.