On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 04:04:49PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The level of spam in the lists is something like 20% these days [*].
>
> Those who still do not see the need to make the lists closed for non
> subscribers or non registered people (via the whitelist), please
> propose a better solution.
Has debian.org's Spamassassin Bayesian database been poisoned? If so,
would flushing the database at random intervals be enough to keep its
usefulness feasible or would it just let too spam in after each flush?
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/>
Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & UNSW Computing Students' Society President
-
"Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature