Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
- From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 00:37:03 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] c7cfd3$vd9$4@sea.gmane.org>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10404270806110.18808-100000@linux.localnet.loc> <87vfjlswxg.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <20040427220408.GC19101@alcor.net> <c6ss2p$eul$3@sea.gmane.org> <20040430154647.GP19139@alcor.net>
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:35:13AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>>
>> > Neither the CFVs nor http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_003 provided
>> > a meaningful account of the changes between the previous Social
>> > Contract and
>> "Eliminate the contentious word software." I think that was mentioned,
>> wasn't it?
>
> Look at the URL for yourself.
Ah. It was
* Eliminate or expand inaccurate references to "software"
--
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Reply to: