I have written a C++ template library for KD-Trees, trying to stay as close as possible to STL containers. The library is not (yet) complete and it's not thoroughly tested. However, given the effort and grief I went through in writing it, I would like to make it available to folks, get people to test it, and hopefully have some peeps submit improvements. It - sports an unlimited number of dimensions (in theory) - can store any data structure, provided the data structure provides operator[0 - k-1] to access the individual dimensional components (arrays, std::vector already do) and a std::less implementation for the type of dimensional components - has support for custom allocators - implements iterators - provides standard find as well as range queries - has amortised O(lg n) time (O(n lg n) worst case) on most operations (insert/erase/find optimised) and worst-case O(n) space. - provides a means to rebalance and thus optimise the tree. - exists in its own namespace - uses STL coding style, basing a lot of the code on stl_tree.h So the question is: should I/can I package it for Debian? It's not yet documented, although the usage should be fairly straight forward. I am hoping to find someone else to document it as I suck at documentation and as the author, it's exceptionally difficult to stay didactically correct. It's just 6 .hpp files, so it would be a -dev package without a .so or .a file. Other than installing the 6 .hpp files into /usr/include/kdtree++, providing pkg-config files and a -config binary, do I need to do anything else? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature