Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, 4 May 2004, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> - ssl-cert
> Rationale? Did you at least check the packages before proposing a mass
> filing? How can a bash script violate DFSG? Please explain.
Oops, sorry, I meant the ca-certificates package.
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, hotmail.com,
jumpy.it, libero.it, netscape.net, postino.it, simplesnet.pt,
tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr.