On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 04:35:20PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote: > In other words, why were the GFDL bugs marked as > sarge-ignore instead of just closed as invalid[or perhaps downgraded to > wishlist]? Because we were expecting to make a policy decision to consider non-free documentation unacceptable for main. At the time, this decision -- like considering whether Build-Depends are release critical, or what version of the Python policy is expected to be supported -- was possible to make at that level. That doesn't seem to be the case any longer. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Protect Open Source in Australia from over-reaching changes to IP law http://www.petitiononline.com/auftaip/ & http://www.linux.org.au/fta/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature