[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: more evil firmwares found

On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 12:37:13AM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> obvious division between a program and its supporting materials.  My
> claim is that only through a massive logical leap can we declare the
> supporting materials to fall under the definition of "program" as well.
> This leap is what is required to remove a freely licensed albeit
> indeterminate binary-blob from Debian on a DFSG basis.

I have a program, http://sourceforge.net/projects/pim-tb, under GPL.
My "preferred form" for working with it is a file called proj.c and a 
set of .c and .xml files, in a flat structure.  I compile proj.c to 
a.out; run ./a.out to produce "proj" bash script, and './proj' creates 
the directory structure, generates Makefile.ac, and makes it a "normal 

In particular the "master copy" of the changelog and Readme (a document) 
is stored on proj.c.  The first time I distributed the project as proj.c 
and a bunch of files in a flat file, people didn't know what the hell to 
do with it.  So I started distributing the resulting output, ready to 
./configure and make.

Clearly, the output is the "preferred form."  However, *I* make the 
master changes to the project in proj.c, blow away the output, and 
distribute the "generated project."

Am I required to distribute proj.c?  Clearly no one else *wants* it.

Reply to: