Re: Bug#244908: is it OK for invoke-rc.d stop not to stop?
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, J.D. Thomas Hood wrote:
> > It also allows you to kill a daemon that doesn't have a PID file.
Daemons without pidfile control are broken and must be fixed.
IMHO lack of pidfile control in a daemon is a severity important bug on
itself. If upstream didn't do the job right, fix it yourself... one can get
simple examples of how to do it from cron and fcron, and a complex one that
allows the forked daemon to comunicate failures and release the parent
process after doing extra pos-fork initialization from cyrus21-imapd.
> When --exec is used without --pidfile, yes. However that isn't
--exec should never be used for stop. If you don't have a pidfile, use
--name and pray that you don't kill the wrong thing -- the real fix IS to
maintain a pidfile properly.
Using --pidfile without --name isn't that much of a good idea, however. I
should probably fix this in the initscripts of the packages I maintain :-)
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot