Re: more evil firmwares found
Don Armstrong <email@example.com> schrieb/wrote:
> Yes, and we've pretty much rejected it. While they might actually use
> ASM, I've yet to run into someone who regularly codes (and modifies
> their code) in machine language.
Even if the firmware is originally written in Assembler, the binary code
(or actually the C struct representing the binary code) could be
considered a "sourcecode equivalent" if it is disassembleable (and simple
enough so that the disassembled code is very similar to the preferred
version to make modifications).