Re: more evil firmwares found
Marco d'Itri wrote:
After the resolution of #239952 I started looking for other binary
firmwares distributed by debian. If we follow the same policy the X and
kernel maintainers will have to remove the 3D drivers for the Matrox and
ATI Rage 128 and Radeon video cards.
The popular acenic ethernet driver will have to go as well.
See #242865 and #242866 for details.
I hope everybody will enjoy their firmware-clean kernels.
1. The kernel is GPL, firmware is part of kernel and thus GPL
compatible. How is GPL not free?
2. There is no free software tools that will compile given firmware
source code into a binary blob. Thus, the binary blob is *the only* way
to distribute the driver in the kernel - pure source code will not compile.
3. By your reasoning, I want to have my kernel in Fortran. If you can
only supply me with the useless blob called C, then it is non-free by
DFSG because I do not consider it source code. I *demand* that the
kernel be removed from Debian. Hasn't anyone considered that maybe the
binary blob *is* the source code? Anyone asked the author(s)?
It is not non-free just because you can't read it. And frankly, there is
*no* comparison with Qt/KDE - that was *license* issues.
Building your applications one byte at a time