[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New summary: Binary peripheral software



J.D. Hood wrote:

> (If we are distributing it then it isn't firmware.  I'll call
> it 'peripheral software' until someone suggests a better term.)
> 
> There are differing views on two different questions:
> Q1: Is binary peripheral software DFSG-free or not?
> Q2: What do we do about it?
> 
> 1. Binary peripheral software is DFSG-free.
>    We distribute it in main.
Nobody really believes this, do they?

> 2. Binary peripheral software is DFSG non-free.
>    We distribute it in non-free.
I think this isn't really common; 4 is generally the view of such people,
but they can't think of cases where the binary is really the preferred
form.  :-)

> 3. Binary peripheral software is DFSG-non-free.
>    We distribute it in main because users can't do without it.
Seems like I've heard this.  Is this Herbert Xu's view?

Seems like it's in contradiction to the Social Contract, though.  I also
think it's factually incorrect (as I've pointed out before).

> 4. Some binary peripheral software is DFSG-free, some isn't,
>    depending on whether or not the binary is really the
>    preferred form for modification.
>    We distribute it in main or non-free as appropriate.
Seems *very* common.  This also happens to be my view.

> 5. Some binary peripheral software is DFSG-free, some isn't,
>    depending on whether or not the licensor designates the
>    binary as the preferred form for modification.
>    We distribute it in main or non-free as appropriate.
Yeah, someone was arguing for that, weren't they.

> 6. Binary peripheral software is DFSG-non-free and, if GPLed,
>    not even distributable in non-free because the preferred
>    form for making modifications is not provided.
>    We don't distribute it at all.
Um, yeah, this is my view as well, combined with 4.
 
> 7. Binary peripheral software is neither DFSG-free nor -non-free
>    because the Debian Free Software Guidelines don't apply to
>    software running on peripherals.
>    We distribute it in main.
This seems to be Marco D'Itri's view, although it also seems to contradict
the Social Contract.

> 
> Keep those opinions coming!
> --
> Thomas Hood
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
> your friends today! Download Messenger Now
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
> 
> 

-- 
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/



Reply to: